Curley v Commonwealth [1909] HCA 8
The expression 'any Australian Colony' in sec. 19 of the Public Service Act 1900 (Vict.) does not include Victoria. Its plain meaning refers to other colonies, not to Victoria itself, and the purpose of the provision was to place officers from Victoria on parity with officers in corresponding positions from other colonies, not to give them the best salary available within Victoria.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Michael Curley; Defendant: The Commonwealth
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Demurrer / Judgment on Demurrer
- Outcome
- Judgment for defendants with costs. Demurrer upheld. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of 'any Australian Colony' in Salary Provision, Public Service Act 1900 (vict.) Sec. 19 Interpretation, Salary Rights of Officers Transferring to Commonwealth
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Michael Curley
Plaintiff
The Commonwealth
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Demurrer / Judgment on Demurrer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'any Australian Colony' in sec. 19 of the Public Service Act 1900 (Vict.) includes Victoria for determining the plaintiff’s salary entitlement
Ratio Decidendi
The expression 'any Australian Colony' in sec. 19 of the Public Service Act 1900 (Vict.) does not include Victoria. Its plain meaning refers to other colonies, not to Victoria itself, and the purpose of the provision was to place officers from Victoria on parity with officers in corresponding positions from other colonies, not to give them the best salary available within Victoria.
Court Disposition
Judgment for defendants with costs. Demurrer upheld. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Judgment for defendants with costs.
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment