Curley v Commonwealth [1909] HCA 8

Curley v Commonwealth [1909] HCA 8

The expression 'any Australian Colony' in sec. 19 of the Public Service Act 1900 (Vict.) does not include Victoria. Its plain meaning refers to other colonies, not to Victoria itself, and the purpose of the provision was to place officers from Victoria on parity with officers in corresponding positions from other colonies, not to give them the best salary available within Victoria.

Parties
Plaintiff: John Michael Curley; Defendant: The Commonwealth
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 March 1909
Procedural Posture
Demurrer / Judgment on Demurrer
Outcome
Judgment for defendants with costs. Demurrer upheld. Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Construction of 'any Australian Colony' in Salary Provision, Public Service Act 1900 (vict.) Sec. 19 Interpretation, Salary Rights of Officers Transferring to Commonwealth

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Michael Curley

Plaintiff

The Commonwealth

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Demurrer / Judgment on Demurrer

  1. 1 Whether 'any Australian Colony' in sec. 19 of the Public Service Act 1900 (Vict.) includes Victoria for determining the plaintiff’s salary entitlement

Ratio Decidendi

The expression 'any Australian Colony' in sec. 19 of the Public Service Act 1900 (Vict.) does not include Victoria. Its plain meaning refers to other colonies, not to Victoria itself, and the purpose of the provision was to place officers from Victoria on parity with officers in corresponding positions from other colonies, not to give them the best salary available within Victoria.

Court Disposition

Judgment for defendants with costs. Demurrer upheld. Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment for defendants with costs.
  • Appeal dismissed with costs.