John Neale Nelson v Scholle Industries [1995] IRCA 476
The applicant received written notice of termination, triggering the statutory time limitation. The delay in commencing proceedings was substantial and not satisfactorily explained. Prejudice to the respondent further weighed against granting an extension of time. Therefore, the application for extension of time was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: John Neale Nelson; Respondent: Scholle Industries
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Preliminary Issues Determination Prior to Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Employment, Extension of Time, Time Limitation Under S.170 Ea(3), Written Notice of Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Neale Nelson
Applicant
Scholle Industries
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Preliminary Issues Determination Prior to Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant received written notice of termination
- 2 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to commence the claim under s.170EA(3)
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant received written notice of termination, triggering the statutory time limitation. The delay in commencing proceedings was substantial and not satisfactorily explained. Prejudice to the respondent further weighed against granting an extension of time. Therefore, the application for extension of time was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment