John Parkes v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 389
The marginal increase in view loss caused by the modified roof form has no significant adverse impact on the heritage significance of 'Loch Lomond'; the modification is acceptable and the appeal should be upheld.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Approval' 'heritage Impact' 'view Loss' 'section 96 Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proposed modification to the roof form causes unacceptable impacts on the heritage item 'Loch Lomond', particularly by way of loss of views to and from the heritage item."]
Ratio Decidendi
The marginal increase in view loss caused by the modified roof form has no significant adverse impact on the heritage significance of 'Loch Lomond'; the modification is acceptable and the appeal should be upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The application to modify Development Application No. 04/0300 to provide for a different roof form for the dwelling at 4 Loch Lomond Crescent, Burraneer is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment