Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 541

Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 541

The Court allocated costs in several interlocutory applications between the parties, ordering costs as paid by the party unsuccessful on the application or as costs in the cause, and in some cases made no order as to costs, based on the nature and result of each application.

Parties
Plaintiff: John Robert Marsden; Defendant: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Decision on Costs Relating to Interlocutory Rulings
Outcome
Orders as to costs made for specific interlocutory applications as detailed in paragraphs 4–18.
Legal Topics
Costs, Interlocutory Rulings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Robert Marsden

Plaintiff

Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation / Decision on Costs Relating to Interlocutory Rulings

  1. 1 Allocation of costs in relation to interlocutory judgments

Ratio Decidendi

The Court allocated costs in several interlocutory applications between the parties, ordering costs as paid by the party unsuccessful on the application or as costs in the cause, and in some cases made no order as to costs, based on the nature and result of each application.

Court Disposition

Orders as to costs made for specific interlocutory applications as detailed in paragraphs 4–18.

Orders

  • No order as to costs for orders of 15 April 1999.
  • No orders for DLJT 45.