Neal v Neal [2018] NSWSC 1669

Neal v Neal [2018] NSWSC 1669

The Court held that the plaintiff was an eligible person who had not received adequate provision for his proper maintenance and advancement in life, taking into account his financial need, efforts to reconcile with his mother, and his estrangement, which was not entirely his fault. The estate was sufficiently large to meet his needs and also the needs of the defendants, who have health-related requirements. A legacy of $400,000 was awarded to the plaintiff.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Judgment After Final Hearing
Outcome
Provision made for the plaintiff out of the estate by a legacy of $400,000. Plaintiff's costs ordered from the estate on an ordinary basis, and defendants' costs on an indemnity basis.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'estrangement' 'adequate Provision' 'testamentary Freedom' 'distribution of Estate']
['equity' 'succession Law'] ['family Provision' 'estrangement' 'adequate Provision' 'testamentary Freedom' 'distribution of Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application / Judgment After Final Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether adequate provision was made for the plaintiff's maintenance, education and advancement in life in the testator's will" "If not, what provision should be made for the plaintiff out of his mother's estate" 'Whether the period of estrangement affects or discounts any provision']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the plaintiff was an eligible person who had not received adequate provision for his proper maintenance and advancement in life, taking into account his financial need, efforts to reconcile with his mother, and his estrangement, which was not entirely his fault. The estate was sufficiently large to meet his needs and also the needs of the defendants, who have health-related requirements. A legacy of $400,000 was awarded to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Provision made for the plaintiff out of the estate by a legacy of $400,000. Plaintiff's costs ordered from the estate on an ordinary basis, and defendants' costs on an indemnity basis.

Orders

  • ['Order that provision be made for the plaintiff out of the estate of the late Maureen Patricia Flis by a legacy of $400,000 inclusive of interest.' "Order that the plaintiff's costs be paid out of the estate on the ordinary basis." "Order that the defendants' costs be paid out of the estate on the indemnity basis."...