Sutton, J.S. v A.J. Thompson Pty Ltd & Ors [1987] FCA 248
The Court held that KLK Manufacturing Pty Ltd engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by making false representations as to the business' sales price, turnover, and viability, and that Mr Sutton, the company's accountant, was knowingly concerned in the contravention. The applicants' lack of reasonable care did...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: JOHN SCOTT SUTTON; Respondent: A.J. THOMPSON PTY LTD (In liquidation); Respondent: ALAN JOHN THOMPSON; Respondent: K.L.K. MANUFACTURING PTY LTD; Respondent: KEVIN ERROL KOCH
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Sale of Business, Representations as to Fact or Expectation, Knowledge of Contravention, Section 52 and 75 B of the Trade Practices Act 1974
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JOHN SCOTT SUTTON
Appellant
A.J. THOMPSON PTY LTD (In liquidation)
Respondent
ALAN JOHN THOMPSON
Respondent
K.L.K. MANUFACTURING PTY LTD
Respondent
KEVIN ERROL KOCH
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether misrepresentations made during the sale of business constituted misleading and deceptive conduct under s.52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974
- 2 Whether the accountant (Mr Sutton) was knowingly concerned in the contravention under s.75B of the Act
- 3 Whether failure by the applicants to take reasonable care of their own interests provided a defence to the action
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that KLK Manufacturing Pty Ltd engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by making false representations as to the business' sales price, turnover, and viability, and that Mr Sutton, the company's accountant, was knowingly concerned in the contravention. The applicants' lack of reasonable care did not prevent a remedy, as the misrepresentations played a significant role in inducing the contract. The trial judge's findings were supported by specific evidence and the overall conduct was assessed correctly. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment