John Shearer Ltd & Anor v Gehl Company [1995] FCA 1034

John Shearer Ltd & Anor v Gehl Company [1995] FCA 1034

The asserted claims by Shearer and Arrowcrest were not sufficiently particularised or supported to constitute 'genuine' offsetting claims under s459H of the Corporations Law, even assuming a valid underlying claim could be cross-demanded against a statutory demand arising from bills of exchange. The appeal was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 December 1995
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal From a Single Judge in the Federal Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['statutory Demand' 'offsetting Claim' 'bills of Exchange' 'set Off' 'unliquidated Damages' 'trade Practices Act' 'guarantee']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Decision on Appeal From a Single Judge in the Federal Court of Australia

  1. 1 ['Whether a debtor corporation can rely on a claim for unliquidated damages as an offsetting claim under s459H of the Corporations Law where the debt arises from dishonoured bills of exchange.' 'Whether the appellants (Shearer and Arrowcrest) had genuine offsetting claims against the respondent (Gehl Company) sufficient to set aside the statutory demands.']

Ratio Decidendi

The asserted claims by Shearer and Arrowcrest were not sufficiently particularised or supported to constitute 'genuine' offsetting claims under s459H of the Corporations Law, even assuming a valid underlying claim could be cross-demanded against a statutory demand arising from bills of exchange. The appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'Parties to file and serve written submissions on costs within seven days of the reasons being delivered.']