Yeo v Paulding [2010] FCA 293
The affidavit demonstrated sufficient justification for the issue of a warrant under s 530C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); confidentiality of the affidavit and annexures was justified in the circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Ex Parte Application in Corporate Liquidation / Interlocutory Application for Issue of Warrant
- Outcome
- Warrant issued; confidentiality orders made; service dispensed with; costs to be costs in the liquidation.
- Legal Topics
- ['issue of Warrant Under Corporations Act S 530 C' 'confidentiality of Affidavit' 'ex Parte Applications in Liquidation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Ex Parte Application in Corporate Liquidation / Interlocutory Application for Issue of Warrant
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a warrant should be issued under s 530C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' 'Whether supporting affidavit should be kept confidential']
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit demonstrated sufficient justification for the issue of a warrant under s 530C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); confidentiality of the affidavit and annexures was justified in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Warrant issued; confidentiality orders made; service dispensed with; costs to be costs in the liquidation.
Orders
- ['The District Registrar issue, pursuant to s 530C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), a warrant in the form annexed.' 'Any requirement that the originating process be served on the defendant is dispensed with; leave granted to make the application ex parte.' 'The affidavit of Andrew Reginald Yeo sworn 19 March 2010...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment