Large v Higham [No 2] [2010] NSWSC 560
The Sylvania Waters Fund (one half of the proceeds of sale of the property known as Sylvania Waters) is designated as notional estate under the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW), as the testator had the power to sever the joint tenancy and did not do so. There was no concurrent express or implied contractual restriction preventing severance, and Maria Large did not provide full valuable consideration to exclude the operation of the notional estate rules. Provision for the plaintiff in the sum of $400,000 (in lieu of provision in the will) is to be paid out of this notional estate, and residual estate entitlements are realigned for the remaining beneficiaries. Costs are apportioned with the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision / Succession / Consequential Orders After Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Provision for plaintiff granted; Sylvania Waters Fund designated notional estate; consequential orders and costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- ['family Provision' 'notional Estate' 'joint Tenancy' 'costs' 'superannuation Fund' 'wills and Probate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Family Provision / Succession / Consequential Orders After Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether one-half of the Sylvania Waters property is notional estate under the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW)' "Whether the testator's omission to sever joint tenancy constitutes a prescribed transaction" "Whether Maria Large's interest is protected as full consideration under the Act" 'Whether the residual estate interests and other beneficiaries (especially Oliver Scott) require adjustment due to the order for provision' 'Appropriate apportionment of costs between parties']
Ratio Decidendi
The Sylvania Waters Fund (one half of the proceeds of sale of the property known as Sylvania Waters) is designated as notional estate under the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW), as the testator had the power to sever the joint tenancy and did not do so. There was no concurrent express or implied contractual restriction preventing severance, and Maria Large did not provide full valuable consideration to exclude the operation of the notional estate rules. Provision for the plaintiff in the sum of $400,000 (in lieu of provision in the will) is to be paid out of this notional estate, and residual estate entitlements are realigned for the remaining beneficiaries. Costs are apportioned with the...
Court Disposition
Provision for plaintiff granted; Sylvania Waters Fund designated notional estate; consequential orders and costs orders made
Orders
- ['One-half of the proceeds of sale of the Sylvania Waters property be designated as notional estate to the extent necessary to satisfy the following orders.' 'The second defendant pay to the plaintiff out of the notional estate the sum of $400,000 such amount being in lieu of the provision for the plaintiff...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment