Szabo v Shaw [2007] NSWLEC 758
The Court was not satisfied that Trees 1 and 3 had caused, were causing, or could cause damage to the applicant's property, so no orders could be made for those trees. Tree 2 had caused displacement of part of the paling fence, but because the respondent agreed to compensate the applicant immediately, no formal orders were made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application Pursuant to S 7 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment After on Site Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for Trees 1 and 3 dismissed; application upheld for Tree 2; no formal orders made because of the respondent's agreement to compensate the applicant for the fence.
- Legal Topics
- ['removal or Pruning of Trees' 'neighbouring Trees Causing Damage' 'compensation for Damaged Fence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Pursuant to S 7 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment After on Site Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether trees on the respondent's property should be removed or pruned because they caused, are causing, or could in the near future cause damage to the applicant's property." 'Whether the respondent should compensate the applicant for damage to a paling fence caused by Tree 2.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was not satisfied that Trees 1 and 3 had caused, were causing, or could cause damage to the applicant's property, so no orders could be made for those trees. Tree 2 had caused displacement of part of the paling fence, but because the respondent agreed to compensate the applicant immediately, no formal orders were made.
Court Disposition
Application for Trees 1 and 3 dismissed; application upheld for Tree 2; no formal orders made because of the respondent's agreement to compensate the applicant for the fence.
Orders
- ['No formal orders of the Court will be made.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment