McKeon v Inner West Council [2022] NSWLEC 1657
The Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision to grant development consent to the amended application subject to conditions was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the identified jurisdictional preconditions were met, including permissibility of the dwelling house use, compliance with relevant development standards, consideration of earthworks, stormwater, BASIX, contamination and notification matters. Accordingly, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the proceedings to be disposed of in accordance with the agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal Concerning Conditions of Development Consent / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application number DA/2022/0241, as amended, approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Appeal' 'conditions of Consent' 'alterations and Additions to Dwelling House' 'swimming Pool and Associated Site Works' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal Concerning Conditions of Development Consent / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court could approve Development Application number DA/2022/0241, as amended, for alterations and additions to the existing dwelling, associated works and swimming pool.' 'Whether the agreed decision to grant development consent subject to conditions was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.' 'Whether jurisdictional preconditions were met, including permissibility in the R1 General Residential zone, compliance with development standards, earthworks, stormwater management, BASIX requirements, contamination considerations and notification.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision to grant development consent to the amended application subject to conditions was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions because the identified jurisdictional preconditions were met, including permissibility of the dwelling house use, compliance with relevant development standards, consideration of earthworks, stormwater, BASIX, contamination and notification matters. Accordingly, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the proceedings to be disposed of in accordance with the agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application number DA/2022/0241, as amended, approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application number DA/2022/0241, as amended, for alterations and additions to the ground and first floor levels of the existing dwelling, associated works and swimming pool on land identified as Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 910369, and known as 159 Flood Street, Leichhardt NSW 2040...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment