John W Wade v The Proprietors SP 56752 & Ors [2004] NSWSC 312
The Tribunal had power under s 32 of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 to amend an application and substitute the correct respondent company for an incorrectly named individual, where the mistake was genuine, was not misleading and there was no reasonable doubt as to identity; such amendments take effect from the date of the original application even if beyond the limitation period; thus, the Tribunal's order was valid and the challenge failed.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John W Wade Pty Limited; First Defendant: The Proprietors Strata Plan 56752; Second Defendant: Fair Trading Administration Corporation; Third Defendant: John Wenden Wade; Fourth Defendant: Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Summons / Judgment After Hearing of Summons Challenging Tribunal Amendment Order
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed. Plaintiff to pay costs. Exhibits may be returned.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Parties, Mistake as to Identity, Tribunal Powers, Limitation Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John W Wade Pty Limited
Plaintiff
The Proprietors Strata Plan 56752
First Defendant
Fair Trading Administration Corporation
Second Defendant
John Wenden Wade
Third Defendant
Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summons / Judgment After Hearing of Summons Challenging Tribunal Amendment Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal had power to amend an application by substituting the correct respondent company for an incorrectly named individual after the limitation period expired
- 2 Whether the amendment effected a substitution outside the permissible scope of the Tribunal's amendment powers
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal had power under s 32 of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 to amend an application and substitute the correct respondent company for an incorrectly named individual, where the mistake was genuine, was not misleading and there was no reasonable doubt as to identity; such amendments take effect from the date of the original application even if beyond the limitation period; thus, the Tribunal's order was valid and the challenge failed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed. Plaintiff to pay costs. Exhibits may be returned.
Orders
- The Summons is dismissed.
- The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the Summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment