Wardy v NSW Trustee and Guardian (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 271
Because the appellant’s solicitor, who had unique knowledge of the case materials, suffered a sudden medical emergency and was unable to participate in the preparation and conduct of the appeal, and there was no opposition from the respondent, the Court was satisfied that the hearing should be vacated and new dates fixed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Hearing
- Outcome
- Application to vacate hearing granted; new hearing date set
- Legal Topics
- ['application to Vacate Hearing' 'adjournment of Appeal' 'procedural Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the hearing date for the appeal should be vacated due to the appellant’s solicitor's sudden medical incapacity"]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the appellant’s solicitor, who had unique knowledge of the case materials, suffered a sudden medical emergency and was unable to participate in the preparation and conduct of the appeal, and there was no opposition from the respondent, the Court was satisfied that the hearing should be vacated and new dates fixed.
Court Disposition
Application to vacate hearing granted; new hearing date set
Orders
- ['Vacate the hearing on 22 and 23 October 2020' 'List the appeal for hearing on 1 and 2 March 2021' "Stand the matter over to the Registrar's list on 8 February 2021. If all steps in preparation of the appeal have been completed that hearing before the Registrar may be vacated by email to the Registrar from the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment