R v White [2001] NSWCCA 108
The applicant did not demonstrate error in the sentencing judge's factual findings or reasoning, and the sentences imposed were well within the appropriate range of the sentencing discretion. The application for leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence From the District Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['robbery in Company' 'stealing From the Person in Circumstances of Aggravation' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'severity Appeal' 'intoxication' 'aboriginality in Sentencing' 'appellate Review of Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence From the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge made an error in imposing sentence.' 'Whether the sentences imposed were outside the range of a sound exercise of sentencing discretion.' 'Whether factual findings challenged by the applicant were open to the sentencing judge.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not demonstrate error in the sentencing judge's factual findings or reasoning, and the sentences imposed were well within the appropriate range of the sentencing discretion. The application for leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Application for leave to appeal is granted.' 'Appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment