Wilson v Condon [2013] FCA 184
The appeal was dismissed because the notice of appeal was embarrassing and vexatious, disclosed no possible basis upon which the appeal could succeed, and the appellant gave no sensible response to the respondent's application for summary dismissal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Condon V Wilson [2012] FMCA 1069 / Directions Hearing; Respondent Applied for Summary Dismissal of the Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Dismissal of Appeal' 'vexatious Proceedings' 'jurisdiction Challenge' 'bankrupt Estate Dividends' 'statement of Affairs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Condon V Wilson [2012] FMCA 1069 / Directions Hearing; Respondent Applied for Summary Dismissal of the Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Federal Court had jurisdiction to deal with the appeal despite the appellant's challenge to the Court's authority." 'Whether the appeal should be summarily dismissed as embarrassing and vexatious and disclosing no possible basis for success.' "Whether the Federal Magistrates Court order concerning distribution of dividends in the appellant's bankrupt estate should be disturbed on appeal."]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the notice of appeal was embarrassing and vexatious, disclosed no possible basis upon which the appeal could succeed, and the appellant gave no sensible response to the respondent's application for summary dismissal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment