Todd v Rex [2024] NSWCCA 161
Because the Agreed Facts did not establish that the applicant could in law be convicted of the offences in counts 3 and 4, a miscarriage of justice would occur if he were not permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas to those counts. The convictions on counts 3 and 4 therefore had to be quashed, the aggregate sentence set aside, and, having regard to fairness and justice, likely little delay, and preservation of appeal rights, the matter remitted to the District Court for resentencing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Conviction and Sentence Appeal / Application to Extend Time and for Leave to Appeal From District Court Convictions and Sentence
- Outcome
- Time extended, leave to amend grounds and leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed, convictions on counts 3 and 4 quashed, aggregate sentence set aside, and matter remitted to the District Court at Lismore.
- Legal Topics
- ['conviction Appeal' 'guilty Pleas' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'attempt to Manufacture a Pistol Without Licence or Permit' 'aggregate Sentence' 'remittal for Resentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Conviction and Sentence Appeal / Application to Extend Time and for Leave to Appeal From District Court Convictions and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the admitted facts established the elements of counts 3 and 4 for attempting to manufacture a pistol without licence or permit contrary to ss 50A(2) and 51CA of the Firearms Act 1996 (NSW).' 'Whether a miscarriage of justice would occur if the applicant were not permitted to withdraw his pleas of guilty to counts 3 and 4.' 'Whether the convictions on counts 3 and 4 and the aggregate sentence should be quashed.' 'Whether this Court should resentence the applicant or remit the matter to the District Court for resentencing.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Agreed Facts did not establish that the applicant could in law be convicted of the offences in counts 3 and 4, a miscarriage of justice would occur if he were not permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas to those counts. The convictions on counts 3 and 4 therefore had to be quashed, the aggregate sentence set aside, and, having regard to fairness and justice, likely little delay, and preservation of appeal rights, the matter remitted to the District Court for resentencing.
Court Disposition
Time extended, leave to amend grounds and leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed, convictions on counts 3 and 4 quashed, aggregate sentence set aside, and matter remitted to the District Court at Lismore.
Orders
- ['Extend the time within which to lodge an appeal.' 'Grant leave to the applicant to amend the grounds of appeal [to be filed within 7 days].' 'Grant leave to appeal.' 'Allow the appeal.' 'Quash the convictions on counts 3 and 4.' 'Set aside the sentence imposed by her Honour Judge English on 20 March 2023.' 'Remit...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment