Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd [1999] FCA 636

Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd [1999] FCA 636

The issue of whether Esso's act or omission caused or contributed to the explosion and fire constituted a substantial common issue of fact under s 33C(1)(c), and the size of the group does not negate this. There was no abuse of process established, nor was there error in the trial judge’s discretion refusing to discontinue the proceedings as representative.

Parties
Applicant: Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd; Applicant: Gregory Alan Dean; Respondent: Esso Australia Ltd; Respondent: Esso Australia Resources Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 May 1999
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal (procedural/interlocutory) / Appellate – Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Orders
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused; application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Representative Proceedings, Negligence, Abuse of Process, Substantial Common Issue, Group Proceedings
Practice and Procedure Torts Representative Proceedings Negligence Abuse of Process Substantial Common Issue Group Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd

Applicant

Gregory Alan Dean

Applicant

Esso Australia Ltd

Respondent

Esso Australia Resources Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal (procedural/interlocutory) / Appellate – Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether proceedings satisfied requirements for representative proceedings under s 33C(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether the court should order discontinuance of representative proceedings under s 33N(1)
  3. 3 Whether the proceedings were an abuse of process for being 'fishing' for a cause of action

Ratio Decidendi

The issue of whether Esso's act or omission caused or contributed to the explosion and fire constituted a substantial common issue of fact under s 33C(1)(c), and the size of the group does not negate this. There was no abuse of process established, nor was there error in the trial judge’s discretion refusing to discontinue the proceedings as representative.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused; application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal be refused.
  • The respondents pay the applicants' taxed costs.