Join Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1551
The Court is satisfied that the modification application results in development substantially the same as originally approved, satisfies jurisdictional prerequisites, and complies with statutory provisions; thus, pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the Court must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Modification Application (class 1) / Post Conciliation Conference, Orders Made
- Outcome
- Modification application approved; development consent modified as per parties' agreement.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Modification Application (class 1) / Post Conciliation Conference, Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the modification application satisfies the requirements of s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the modification results in development substantially the same as the originally approved development' "Whether the parties' agreement satisfies jurisdictional prerequisites under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court is satisfied that the modification application results in development substantially the same as originally approved, satisfies jurisdictional prerequisites, and complies with statutory provisions; thus, pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the Court must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Modification application approved; development consent modified as per parties' agreement.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Modification Application MA24/0132 is approved.' 'Development Consent No DA22/0151 is modified in the terms in Annexure A.' 'Development Consent No DA22/0151 as modified by the Court is Annexure B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment