R v Munshizada; R v Danishyar; R v Baines (No 1) [2019] NSWSC 293
The two murders were alleged premeditated, targeted executions committed about nine weeks apart from stolen vehicles bearing false plates, with multiple distinctive similarities including ambush of victims leaving premises, concealment by a left-handed gunman, use of a 9mm handgun, rapid approach by the attack vehicle and close-range shots to the victims after they fell. Taken with other Crown evidence, those similarities gave the evidence of the two shootings significant probative value as coincidence evidence to prove that Sultani was the gunman on both occasions and to support the alleged participation of the accused in the charged murders. The probative value substantially outweighed...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Proceedings for Murder / Pre Trial Application for Leave to Present a Fresh Indictment, Joinder of Counts, Severance and Separate Trial Ruling
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the Crown to present a fresh indictment; joint trial on both murder counts ordered; Baines' application for a separate trial dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Counts' 'severance of Counts' 'separate Trial' 'coincidence Evidence' 'cross Admissibility' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'accessory Before the Fact' 'prejudicial Effect' 'jury Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceedings for Murder / Pre Trial Application for Leave to Present a Fresh Indictment, Joinder of Counts, Severance and Separate Trial Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Crown should be granted leave to present a fresh indictment charging the three accused jointly with the murders of Mehmet Yilmaz and Pasquale Barbaro.' 'Whether the two murder counts should be tried together on one indictment or severed into separate trials.' 'Whether evidence of each murder was cross-admissible as coincidence evidence under s 98 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).' 'Whether the probative value of the coincidence evidence substantially outweighed any prejudicial effect under s 101 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).' 'Whether jury directions would be capable of averting impermissible prejudice from a joint trial on both counts.' 'Whether Joshua Donald Baines should be tried separately from Siar Munshizada on the Barbaro murder charge because of admissions allegedly made by Munshizada to a prison informant.']
Ratio Decidendi
The two murders were alleged premeditated, targeted executions committed about nine weeks apart from stolen vehicles bearing false plates, with multiple distinctive similarities including ambush of victims leaving premises, concealment by a left-handed gunman, use of a 9mm handgun, rapid approach by the attack vehicle and close-range shots to the victims after they fell. Taken with other Crown evidence, those similarities gave the evidence of the two shootings significant probative value as coincidence evidence to prove that Sultani was the gunman on both occasions and to support the alleged participation of the accused in the charged murders. The probative value substantially outweighed...
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the Crown to present a fresh indictment; joint trial on both murder counts ordered; Baines' application for a separate trial dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the Crown to present a fresh indictment against Siar Munshizada, Mirwais Danishyar and Joshua Donald Baines charging that on 9 September 2016 at St Marys in the State of New South Wales they did murder Mehmet Yilmaz and that on 14 November 2016 at Earlwood in the State of New South Wales they...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment