Ferdinands v The State of South Australia [2016] FCA 1268
Neither Kingsley Ferdinands Film Group nor South Australia Police are legal entities capable of suing or being sued; the proper applicant is Trevor Kingsley Ferdinands and the proper respondent is The State of South Australia; the grounds for disqualification of the judge for bias are not established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Orders and Reasons for Interlocutory Decisions
- Outcome
- second applicant's application for judicial disqualification dismissed; title of proceedings amended
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'disqualification for Bias' 'capacity to Sue' 'proper Respondent in Crown Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Orders and Reasons for Interlocutory Decisions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether the first applicant is a legal entity capable of suing' 'whether South Australia Police is a legal entity capable of being sued' 'whether the judge should be disqualified for bias or apprehended bias' 'proper party to sue in Crown proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Neither Kingsley Ferdinands Film Group nor South Australia Police are legal entities capable of suing or being sued; the proper applicant is Trevor Kingsley Ferdinands and the proper respondent is The State of South Australia; the grounds for disqualification of the judge for bias are not established.
Court Disposition
second applicant's application for judicial disqualification dismissed; title of proceedings amended
Orders
- ["The second applicant's application for an order that the judge disqualify herself is dismissed." 'The title of the action be amended to remove the first applicant, name Trevor Kingsley Ferdinands as sole applicant, remove the first respondent, and name The State of South Australia as sole respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment