Suncorp-Metway Limited (ACN 010 831 722) v Sapuppo [2001] FCA 708

Suncorp-Metway Limited (ACN 010 831 722) v Sapuppo [2001] FCA 708

The Federal Court Rules confer a discretion to permit joinder on appeal wider than previous case authorities, and the bank's interest in maintaining indemnity orders constitutes a sufficient legal interest to justify joinder.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Motion for Joinder in Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal Stage
Outcome
application for joinder granted
Legal Topics
['joinder of Parties' 'appeals']
['practice and Procedure'] ['joinder of Parties' 'appeals']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motion for Joinder in Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal Stage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether O 52 r 14(2) of the Federal Court Rules justifies joinder on appeal of a party from the trial where only commercial interests are affected.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Court Rules confer a discretion to permit joinder on appeal wider than previous case authorities, and the bank's interest in maintaining indemnity orders constitutes a sufficient legal interest to justify joinder.

Court Disposition

application for joinder granted

Orders

  • ['The applicant be joined as second respondent to appeal proceedings Q 60 of 2001.' 'The costs of the notice of motion be reserved to the Full Court.']