Campbell Taylor v Council of the Municipality of Woollahra (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 106
The issues raised by the Intervenors were already fully ventilated through the hearing process, including written evidence, expert reports, and submissions; none of the six factors identified warrant joinder as they either have been addressed or are not matters for the Commissioner. The legislative requirements for joinder under s 8.15(2) are not satisfied.
- Parties
- Intervenor (first Applicant on the Notice of Motion): Julie-Anne McMillan; Intervenor (second Applicant on the Notice of Motion): Frances Ezra; Intervenor (third Applicant on the Notice of Motion): Jack Ezra; Intervenor (fourth Applicant on the Notice of Motion): Michael Hammond; Intervenor (fifth Applicant on the Notice of Motion): Lisa Stephens; Respondent (first Respondent on the Notice of Motion): Council of the Municipality of Woollahra; Applicant (second Respondent on the Notice of Motion): Campbell Taylor
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Notice of Motion for Joinder
- Outcome
- Application for joinder dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Development Consent, Intervenors, Community Consultation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julie-Anne McMillan
Intervenor (first Applicant on the Notice of Motion)
Frances Ezra
Intervenor (second Applicant on the Notice of Motion)
Jack Ezra
Intervenor (third Applicant on the Notice of Motion)
Michael Hammond
Intervenor (fourth Applicant on the Notice of Motion)
Lisa Stephens
Intervenor (fifth Applicant on the Notice of Motion)
Council of the Municipality of Woollahra
Respondent (first Respondent on the Notice of Motion)
Campbell Taylor
Applicant (second Respondent on the Notice of Motion)
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Notice of Motion for Joinder
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Intervenors should be joined pursuant to s 8.15(2) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether issues raised by Intervenors would be sufficiently addressed absent joinder
- 3 Whether the interests of justice or public interest warrant joinder
Ratio Decidendi
The issues raised by the Intervenors were already fully ventilated through the hearing process, including written evidence, expert reports, and submissions; none of the six factors identified warrant joinder as they either have been addressed or are not matters for the Commissioner. The legislative requirements for joinder under s 8.15(2) are not satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application for joinder dismissed
Orders
- The Notice of Motion is dismissed.
- The s 34AA conciliation conference be relisted before the Commissioner at 4.15pm on 9 August 2022.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment