CARSON v LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSIONER (NO 1) [1997] NSWCA 61
No ground was shown for adding Mr Rajski as a party for any purpose; the proceedings concerned acts or omissions of the first opponent, and Mr Rajski demonstrated no right or claim justifying joinder. Nor was his participation as amicus curiae necessary or desirable.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nicholas Roderick Carson; First Opponent: Legal Services Commissioner; Second Opponent: Legal Services Tribunal; Applicant for Joinder/amicus: Leszek Rajski
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Interlocutory Motion for Joinder/amicus
- Outcome
- Application by Mr Rajski for joinder as party or amicus curiae dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Amicus Curiae, Judicial Disqualification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Roderick Carson
Claimant
Legal Services Commissioner
First Opponent
Legal Services Tribunal
Second Opponent
Leszek Rajski
Applicant for Joinder/amicus
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Interlocutory Motion for Joinder/amicus
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Rajski should be added as a party for the purpose of seeking orders regarding bench composition
- 2 Whether Mr Rajski should be permitted to appear as amicus curiae
Ratio Decidendi
No ground was shown for adding Mr Rajski as a party for any purpose; the proceedings concerned acts or omissions of the first opponent, and Mr Rajski demonstrated no right or claim justifying joinder. Nor was his participation as amicus curiae necessary or desirable.
Court Disposition
Application by Mr Rajski for joinder as party or amicus curiae dismissed
Orders
- Application by Mr Rajski to be joined as party dismissed
- Application by Mr Rajski to appear as amicus curiae dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment