R v Ngo; Dao; Dinh [2000] NSWSC 964
It is now appropriate to revoke the order for a separate trial for Dinh, as the evidence against him is sufficiently linked to the common enterprise with Ngo and Dao, most relevant evidence is admissible, and no positive injustice or unfair prejudice would arise from a joint trial. Therefore, a joint indictment may be presented.
- Parties
- Accused: Phuong Canh Ngo; Accused: Tu Quang Dao; Accused: David Duy Thai Dinh; Crown: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Joint Trial
- Outcome
- Order for separate trial for Dinh revoked; leave granted for joint indictment if Crown so desires.
- Legal Topics
- Joint and Separate Trials, Admissibility of Evidence, Prejudice in Joint Trials
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phuong Canh Ngo
Accused
Tu Quang Dao
Accused
David Duy Thai Dinh
Accused
Regina
Crown
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Joint Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dinh should be tried jointly with Ngo and Dao for the murder of John Newman
- 2 Whether evidence admissible against Ngo and Dao is unfairly prejudicial to Dinh
Ratio Decidendi
It is now appropriate to revoke the order for a separate trial for Dinh, as the evidence against him is sufficiently linked to the common enterprise with Ngo and Dao, most relevant evidence is admissible, and no positive injustice or unfair prejudice would arise from a joint trial. Therefore, a joint indictment may be presented.
Court Disposition
Order for separate trial for Dinh revoked; leave granted for joint indictment if Crown so desires.
Orders
- The order directing a separate trial in relation to Dinh is revoked.
- Leave is granted to the Crown to present a joint indictment against Ngo, Dao and Dinh.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment