ACE Project Group Pty Limited & Anor v Ginger Development Enterprises Pty Limited and Ors [2007] NSWSC 1229
Plaintiffs are liable to meet 49 percent of the overall loss, including repayment of advances, under the joint venture agreement, and the Court has jurisdiction to make an order for payment to the defendants despite lack of a cross-claim due to equitable and procedural principles.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Ace Project Group Pty Limited; Second Plaintiff: Shan Ruan; First Defendant: Ginger Development Enterprises Pty Limited; Second Defendant: Yau Fong Yuen; Third Defendant: Yuk Mui Kum
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding / Final Judgment After Accounting
- Outcome
- Judgment for the first defendant for the plaintiffs’ proportion of the loss; direction for the parties to bring in short minutes of order; costs awarded as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Joint Venture Agreements, Profit and Loss Sharing, Accounting in Equity, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ace Project Group Pty Limited
First Plaintiff
Shan Ruan
Second Plaintiff
Ginger Development Enterprises Pty Limited
First Defendant
Yau Fong Yuen
Second Defendant
Yuk Mui Kum
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding / Final Judgment After Accounting
Legal Issues
- 1 whether plaintiffs are liable to meet their proportion of the loss under a joint venture agreement
- 2 correct method of calculating the loss including repayment of advances
- 3 interest differential liability resulting from injunctive orders
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs are liable to meet 49 percent of the overall loss, including repayment of advances, under the joint venture agreement, and the Court has jurisdiction to make an order for payment to the defendants despite lack of a cross-claim due to equitable and procedural principles.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the first defendant for the plaintiffs’ proportion of the loss; direction for the parties to bring in short minutes of order; costs awarded as specified.
Orders
- Judgment in favour of the first defendant for either $340,483.09 or $190,483.09 plus $150,000, subject to accounting for repayments.
- Order discharging injunction granted in March 2004.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment