Jamal v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 420

As the Director of Public Prosecutions no longer sought an order for remittal, and there was no further contention, the Court makes no further order in this matter.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 10 December 2013
Procedural Posture: Application for Prerogative Relief / Post Hearing Consequential Order
Outcome: No further order made.
Legal Topics: ['remittal of Proceedings' 'good Behaviour Bonds' 'jurisdiction (criminal/civil)']

['criminal Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['remittal of Proceedings' 'good Behaviour Bonds' 'jurisdiction (criminal/civil)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Prerogative Relief / Post Hearing Consequential Order

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the proceedings should be remitted to the District Court to exercise its criminal jurisdiction under s 97 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999']

Ratio Decidendi

As the Director of Public Prosecutions no longer sought an order for remittal, and there was no further contention, the Court makes no further order in this matter.

Court Disposition

No further order made.

Orders

['The Court notes that it makes no further order in this matter.']