Jamal v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2016] NSWCA 345
The court granted the adjournment because the respondent did not oppose and the applicant provided medical documentation, but signalled that indefinite adjournments may not be granted if the applicant is unable to attend and does not consent to the leave application being dealt with on the papers, and the court may exercise its power to dispense with consent requirement under s 14 of the Civil Procedure Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Adjournment Application Before Hearing of Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- adjournment granted; hearing to be relisted; costs order made
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'leave to Appeal' 'dispensation of Rules' 'court Powers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Adjournment Application Before Hearing of Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an adjournment should be granted for medical reasons' "Whether the leave application may be dispensed with hearing on the papers without applicant's consent" 'Whether the Court may dispense with requirements under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 51.15']
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the adjournment because the respondent did not oppose and the applicant provided medical documentation, but signalled that indefinite adjournments may not be granted if the applicant is unable to attend and does not consent to the leave application being dealt with on the papers, and the court may exercise its power to dispense with consent requirement under s 14 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Court Disposition
adjournment granted; hearing to be relisted; costs order made
Orders
- ["Grant the applicant's request for an adjournment of the hearing fixed for 8 December 2016." 'Direct that the Registrar fix a date for the hearing of the application for leave to appeal in February 2017.' "The respondent's costs of today to be the Commissioner's costs in the leave application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment