Police v Andonakis [2023] NSWLC 15
Given the offender's extended record of similar offending, including offending while on parole and bail, ongoing disregard for court orders, the absence of rehabilitation prospects, and the serious risk to community safety, the sentences for all 'drive whilst disqualified' offences must be custodial and aggregate to full-time imprisonment. Assertions of honest belief do not mitigate moral culpability, the principles of deterrence and protection predominate, and an Intensive Correction Order is not appropriate. Disqualification periods are to be applied according to statute but staggered to ensure at least 3 years of disqualification post-release.
- Parties
- Prosecution: NSW Police Force; Defendant: Jonathan Andonakis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Full-time imprisonment imposed; convictions entered on all counts.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drive Disqualified, Drive With Illicit Drug, Speeding, Recidivism, Community Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NSW Police Force
Prosecution
Jonathan Andonakis
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Sentence / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for repeated offences of driving whilst disqualified, driving with illicit drug, and speeding, given the offender's extensive record, conditional liberty, and asserted subjective beliefs?
- 2 Does the offender's belief regarding his disqualification status reduce moral culpability?
- 3 Should the sentence be a full-time custodial sentence or an Intensive Correction Order (ICO)?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's extended record of similar offending, including offending while on parole and bail, ongoing disregard for court orders, the absence of rehabilitation prospects, and the serious risk to community safety, the sentences for all 'drive whilst disqualified' offences must be custodial and aggregate to full-time imprisonment. Assertions of honest belief do not mitigate moral culpability, the principles of deterrence and protection predominate, and an Intensive Correction Order is not appropriate. Disqualification periods are to be applied according to statute but staggered to ensure at least 3 years of disqualification post-release.
Court Disposition
Full-time imprisonment imposed; convictions entered on all counts.
Orders
- Convicted on all counts.
- Aggregate sentence of 2 years 8 months imprisonment (11 March 2023 – 10 November 2025).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment