Morris v McConaghy Australia Pty Ltd (No 4) [2018] FCA 1516
Service under the Hague Convention, although inconvenient and delayed, is not 'not practicable' within the meaning of FCR r 10.48. As such, deemed service is not available and the applicant must attempt service again under the Hague Convention.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jonathan Morris; First Respondent: McConaghy Australia Pty Ltd ACN 52 168 218 380; Second Respondent: MC2 Composites Ltd; Third Respondent: Mark Evans; Fourth Respondent: Tiger Yacht Management Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Order of Deemed Service Under FCR R 10.48
- Outcome
- Application for deemed service dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Deemed Service, International Service of Process, Service Under Hague Convention, Impracticability of Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jonathan Morris
Applicant
McConaghy Australia Pty Ltd ACN 52 168 218 380
First Respondent
MC2 Composites Ltd
Second Respondent
Mark Evans
Third Respondent
Tiger Yacht Management Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Order of Deemed Service Under FCR R 10.48
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is 'not practicable' to effect service under the Hague Convention for purposes of FCR r 10.48
- 2 Whether order for deemed service should be made under FCR r 10.48
Ratio Decidendi
Service under the Hague Convention, although inconvenient and delayed, is not 'not practicable' within the meaning of FCR r 10.48. As such, deemed service is not available and the applicant must attempt service again under the Hague Convention.
Court Disposition
Application for deemed service dismissed.
Orders
- Prayer 1 of the interlocutory application filed on 27 July 2018 is dismissed.
- The matter be listed for a case management hearing on 19 October 2018 at 9.30am for determination of costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment