Regina v Perese [2001] NSWCCA 478

Regina v Perese [2001] NSWCCA 478

Given the applicant's significant criminal history, the seriousness of the offences, and the amounts stolen, the imposed sentence was not manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge adequately considered relevant principles, and no error warranted interference with the sentence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Outcome
leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'robbery in Company' 'plea of Guilty' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'offences Taken Into Account']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'robbery in Company' 'plea of Guilty' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'offences Taken Into Account']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to separately identify the component of the sentence relating to different offences' 'Whether the principles in R v Henry & Ors applied' 'Whether adequate weight was given to plea of guilty']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the applicant's significant criminal history, the seriousness of the offences, and the amounts stolen, the imposed sentence was not manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge adequately considered relevant principles, and no error warranted interference with the sentence.

Court Disposition

leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']