Towers v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2023] NSWSC 1181

Towers v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2023] NSWSC 1181

The applicant did not show cause why his detention was not justified. The seriousness of the alleged offences, including offences carrying maximum penalties of life imprisonment, the substantial amount of drugs, the likelihood of a substantial sentence on conviction, and the powerful prosecution case overwhelmed the favourable matters and the proposed conditions. The Court was also satisfied that concerns about failing to appear and committing a serious offence were very real and would be unacceptable despite the proposed conditions if the unacceptable risk test were reached.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Bail Release Application / Supreme Court Application for Release on Bail; First Bail Application to Any Court After Refusal of Bail Upon Arrest by a Police Officer
Outcome
Bail refused
Legal Topics
['show Cause Requirement' 'unacceptable Risk' 'drug Supply Offences' 'temporary Release for Medico Legal Examination' 'bail Conditions' 'supreme Court Bail Jurisdiction']
['criminal Law' 'bail'] ['show Cause Requirement' 'unacceptable Risk' 'drug Supply Offences' 'temporary Release for Medico Legal Examination' 'bail Conditions' 'supreme Court Bail Jurisdiction']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bail Release Application / Supreme Court Application for Release on Bail; First Bail Application to Any Court After Refusal of Bail Upon Arrest by a Police Officer

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant had shown cause why his detention was not justified under the Bail Act 2013 (NSW).' 'Whether proposed stringent conditions, including electronic monitoring and a proposed return to court in three months to seek revocation of bail, sufficiently addressed bail concerns.' "Whether the applicant's need for release to obtain a medico-legal examination for an unrelated personal injuries claim justified release on bail." 'Whether bail concerns of failing to appear and committing a serious offence were unacceptable.']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not show cause why his detention was not justified. The seriousness of the alleged offences, including offences carrying maximum penalties of life imprisonment, the substantial amount of drugs, the likelihood of a substantial sentence on conviction, and the powerful prosecution case overwhelmed the favourable matters and the proposed conditions. The Court was also satisfied that concerns about failing to appear and committing a serious offence were very real and would be unacceptable despite the proposed conditions if the unacceptable risk test were reached.

Court Disposition

Bail refused

Orders

  • ['Application for release on bail refused.']