Lee v Micha International Pty Limited [2009] NSWDC 91
The claim for rectification of the written agreement for sale of a business exceeding $20,000 is beyond the jurisdiction of the District Court; however, leave is granted to amend the statement of claim to plead an alternative contract, subject to the defendant's right to seek an adjournment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for leave to amend statement of claim allowed in part and refused in part.
- Legal Topics
- ['rectification of Contract' 'sale of Business' 'equitable Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the District Court has jurisdiction to grant rectification of a contract where the purchase price exceeds the statutory limit' 'Whether the plaintiff may amend the statement of claim to plead an alternative contract']
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for rectification of the written agreement for sale of a business exceeding $20,000 is beyond the jurisdiction of the District Court; however, leave is granted to amend the statement of claim to plead an alternative contract, subject to the defendant's right to seek an adjournment.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for leave to amend statement of claim allowed in part and refused in part.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to amend statement of claim insofar as it allows the plaintiff to plead a contract other than the written agreement.' 'Leave to add claim for rectification of the contract refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment