Lee v Micha International Pty Limited [2009] NSWDC 91

Lee v Micha International Pty Limited [2009] NSWDC 91

The claim for rectification of the written agreement for sale of a business exceeding $20,000 is beyond the jurisdiction of the District Court; however, leave is granted to amend the statement of claim to plead an alternative contract, subject to the defendant's right to seek an adjournment.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
Outcome
Plaintiff's application for leave to amend statement of claim allowed in part and refused in part.
Legal Topics
['rectification of Contract' 'sale of Business' 'equitable Jurisdiction']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim

  1. 1 ['Whether the District Court has jurisdiction to grant rectification of a contract where the purchase price exceeds the statutory limit' 'Whether the plaintiff may amend the statement of claim to plead an alternative contract']

Ratio Decidendi

The claim for rectification of the written agreement for sale of a business exceeding $20,000 is beyond the jurisdiction of the District Court; however, leave is granted to amend the statement of claim to plead an alternative contract, subject to the defendant's right to seek an adjournment.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application for leave to amend statement of claim allowed in part and refused in part.

Orders

  • ['Leave granted to amend statement of claim insofar as it allows the plaintiff to plead a contract other than the written agreement.' 'Leave to add claim for rectification of the contract refused.']