Inspector Sara Bestre v Jontari Pty Ltd and Inspector Sara Bestre v Tempo Services Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 373
The defendants failed to provide and enforce a safe system of work for cleaners working alone in isolated areas, failed to conduct proper risk assessments, and inadequately responded to foreseeable risks of assault. The measures actually available and later taken showed that practical steps could and should have been implemented. The system of work was inconsistently applied and not enforced. The defendants' focus on the particular incident, rather than the general risk, was misplaced. Accordingly, both Jontari and Tempo were found in breach of their statutory duties. The statutory defences under s 28(a) and (b) were not made out.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution / Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- defendants found guilty
- Legal Topics
- ['breach of Duty' 'risk Assessment' 'working Alone' 'employee Training' 'safety Systems']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Jontari Pty Ltd breached s 8(1) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 by failing to provide and maintain a safe system of work for cleaners working alone and/or in isolated areas' 'Whether Tempo Services Ltd breached s 8(2) of the same Act by failing to ensure health and safety' 'Whether statutory defences under s 28(a) and (b) are available to the defendants']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants failed to provide and enforce a safe system of work for cleaners working alone in isolated areas, failed to conduct proper risk assessments, and inadequately responded to foreseeable risks of assault. The measures actually available and later taken showed that practical steps could and should have been implemented. The system of work was inconsistently applied and not enforced. The defendants' focus on the particular incident, rather than the general risk, was misplaced. Accordingly, both Jontari and Tempo were found in breach of their statutory duties. The statutory defences under s 28(a) and (b) were not made out.
Court Disposition
defendants found guilty
Orders
- ['Matter to be listed for sentencing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment