Trajkovski v Ken's Painting & Decorating Services Pty Limited & anor [2002] NSWSC 568

Trajkovski v Ken's Painting & Decorating Services Pty Limited & anor [2002] NSWSC 568

The plaintiff's incapacity and need for domestic services, loss of earning capacity, and other heads of damages flow from the workplace injury sustained and subsequent psychiatric reaction. Drug and alcohol dependency, though exacerbated by prescription access and boredom from inability to work, remained causally connected, and the plaintiff is entitled to corresponding damages. Apportionment between defendants according to agreement is appropriate, and damages calculated based on a conservative but fair estimate of prior earnings, income loss, and needs for care.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 September 2002
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Damages Assessment / Final Judgment With Quantum and Orders
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiff against first and second defendants. Orders for payment of agreed costs proportions. Cross-claims dismissed by consent.
Legal Topics
['assessment of Damages' 'employer Liability' 'contributory Negligence' 'apportionment of Liability']
['tort Law' 'workers Compensation' 'personal Injury'] ['assessment of Damages' 'employer Liability' 'contributory Negligence' 'apportionment of Liability']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Damages Assessment / Final Judgment With Quantum and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Extent of injuries suffered by the plaintiff in the workplace accident' 'Apportionment of liability between employer and other defendant(s)' 'Assessment of damages under the Workers Compensation Act and at common law' 'Causation regarding effects of drug and alcohol addiction' 'Entitlement to domestic assistance and other heads of damages']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's incapacity and need for domestic services, loss of earning capacity, and other heads of damages flow from the workplace injury sustained and subsequent psychiatric reaction. Drug and alcohol dependency, though exacerbated by prescription access and boredom from inability to work, remained causally connected, and the plaintiff is entitled to corresponding damages. Apportionment between defendants according to agreement is appropriate, and damages calculated based on a conservative but fair estimate of prior earnings, income loss, and needs for care.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiff against first and second defendants. Orders for payment of agreed costs proportions. Cross-claims dismissed by consent.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of $643,359.10.' 'Judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant in the sum of $810,354.10.' "First defendant to pay 40 percent of the plaintiff's costs." "Second defendant to pay 60 percent of the plaintiff's costs." 'All remaining...