Chidiac v Bhatt, Vaidya and Rosybarb Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1279
Damages awarded based on industry average profits for wheelchair-accessible taxis (CIE report), discounted for loss of opportunity (15%). Tax gross-up denied due to lack of expert evidence and uncertainty. Costs awarded proportionally based on success and hearing days.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Joseph Chidiac; First Defendant: Prashant Bhatt; Second Defendant: Gayatri Vaidya; Third Defendant: Rosybarb Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Corporations List / Post Quantification of Damages; Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff; partial costs awarded; interest ordered; tax gross-up denied.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Measure of Damages, Remoteness of Damages, Taxation and Damages, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Chidiac
Plaintiff
Prashant Bhatt
First Defendant
Gayatri Vaidya
Second Defendant
Rosybarb Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List / Post Quantification of Damages; Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Quantification of damages for breach of contract
- 2 Whether damages should be grossed-up for taxation impact
- 3 Assessment of costs
Ratio Decidendi
Damages awarded based on industry average profits for wheelchair-accessible taxis (CIE report), discounted for loss of opportunity (15%). Tax gross-up denied due to lack of expert evidence and uncertainty. Costs awarded proportionally based on success and hearing days.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff; partial costs awarded; interest ordered; tax gross-up denied.
Orders
- Judgment in favour of Mr Chidiac against Mr Bhatt in the amount of $29,219 and interest under s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).
- Prashant Bhatt to pay half of Mr Chidiac's costs of and incidental to the hearings on 1–3 and 24–25 July 2014 referable to liability.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment