De Varda v Austin [2019] NSWCA 133
Due to the grant of leave to appeal on grounds of a real question of procedural fairness regarding the vexatious proceedings orders, and the applicants' lack of means, it was in the interests of justice to grant referral to the pro bono panel for legal assistance in the appeal process.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application—order for Pro Bono Referral Pending Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for referral to pro bono panel granted; application for stay refused
- Legal Topics
- ['pro Bono Legal Assistance' 'vexatious Proceedings' 'procedural Fairness' 'appeals']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application—order for Pro Bono Referral Pending Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a material change in circumstances justified a pro bono referral under r 7.36 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)' 'Whether the applicants were denied procedural fairness before vexatious proceedings orders were made' 'Scope of the referral for legal assistance in the appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
Due to the grant of leave to appeal on grounds of a real question of procedural fairness regarding the vexatious proceedings orders, and the applicants' lack of means, it was in the interests of justice to grant referral to the pro bono panel for legal assistance in the appeal process.
Court Disposition
Application for referral to pro bono panel granted; application for stay refused
Orders
- ['The applicants be referred to the registrar for referral to a barrister on the pro bono panel for legal assistance, including provision of advice on appeal, preparation of written submissions, and appearance at the appeal hearing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment