De Varda v Austin [2018] NSWCA 263
The application for leave to appeal from the order dismissing the 2018 proceedings stands dismissed pursuant to s 13(3) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), as it was filed without leave, and 28 days lapsed. No pro bono referral order is made as the prospects of appeal are negligible and proceedings are repetitive. Costs are ordered in accordance with the respective parties' involvement and interests in the two notice of motions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph de Varda; Second Applicant: Samuel Tov-Lev; First Respondent: David Austin; Second Respondent: Eddy Neumann; Third Respondent: Murray Selig; Fourth Respondent: John Lowbeer
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal – Hearing of Notice of Motions and Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed; motions determined; costs ordered
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigant, Leave to Appeal, Costs, Pro Bono Referral
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph de Varda
Applicant
Samuel Tov-Lev
Second Applicant
David Austin
First Respondent
Eddy Neumann
Second Respondent
Murray Selig
Third Respondent
John Lowbeer
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal – Hearing of Notice of Motions and Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summons seeking leave to appeal stands dismissed by operation of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), s 13(3)
- 2 Whether orders for pro bono referral should be made under UCPR, r 7.36
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded on notice of motions
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal from the order dismissing the 2018 proceedings stands dismissed pursuant to s 13(3) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), as it was filed without leave, and 28 days lapsed. No pro bono referral order is made as the prospects of appeal are negligible and proceedings are repetitive. Costs are ordered in accordance with the respective parties' involvement and interests in the two notice of motions.
Court Disposition
summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed; motions determined; costs ordered
Orders
- Declare that the summons seeking leave to appeal filed 7 September 2018, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the order dismissing the 2018 proceedings, stands dismissed pursuant to the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), s 13(3)
- The applicants' notice of motion of 9 October 2018 be dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment