Golden v V’landys [2015] NSWSC 1709

Golden v V’landys [2015] NSWSC 1709

The court found that neither actual nor apprehended bias was established, as the process was fair and the plaintiff's allegations lacked evidentiary support. The decisions to suspend the licence and warn the plaintiff off were made lawfully, for the proper purpose of protecting the reputation of racing, and were not unreasonable or attended by bad faith. The plaintiff failed to establish the necessary elements of misfeasance in public office or to prove actual loss.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review and Tort Claim / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the defendants.
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'actual Bias' 'apprehended Bias' 'unreasonableness' 'improper Purpose' 'misfeasance in Public Office' 'procedural Fairness' 'statutory Powers' 'disciplinary Proceedings in Sport']
['administrative Law' 'tort Law' 'sports Law'] ['judicial Review' 'actual Bias' 'apprehended Bias' 'unreasonableness' 'improper Purpose' 'misfeasance in Public Office' 'procedural Fairness' 'statutory Powers' 'disciplinary Proceedings in Sport']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review and Tort Claim / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether decisions of Racing NSW to suspend the trainer's licence and to warn the plaintiff off racetracks were invalid due to actual bias, apprehended bias, unreasonableness, bad faith, improper purpose, or irrelevant considerations" "Whether Mr V'landys committed the tort of misfeasance in public office"]

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that neither actual nor apprehended bias was established, as the process was fair and the plaintiff's allegations lacked evidentiary support. The decisions to suspend the licence and warn the plaintiff off were made lawfully, for the proper purpose of protecting the reputation of racing, and were not unreasonable or attended by bad faith. The plaintiff failed to establish the necessary elements of misfeasance in public office or to prove actual loss.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the defendants.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the defendants.' "Unless any party makes an application for a different order in writing to my Associate within seven days, order the plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings."]