Hanna v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (Costs) [2023] FCA 695
Given the adverse impact of the Tribunal's administrative missteps on Mr Hanna's opportunity to make a valid application within the prescribed period, it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary rule that costs follow the event and to make no order as to costs both at first instance and on appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (costs) / Post Judgment (costs Determination After Appeal Dismissed)
- Outcome
- No order as to costs at first instance or on appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Discretion' 'merits Review' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (costs) / Post Judgment (costs Determination After Appeal Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether administrative missteps by the Tribunal should affect the order for costs following the dismissal of an appeal' 'Whether it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary rule that costs follow the event']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the adverse impact of the Tribunal's administrative missteps on Mr Hanna's opportunity to make a valid application within the prescribed period, it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary rule that costs follow the event and to make no order as to costs both at first instance and on appeal.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs at first instance or on appeal.
Orders
- ["Order 2 of Judge Egan's orders (9 March 2022) set aside; no order as to costs of proceedings at first instance." 'No order as to costs in proceeding NSD 215 of 2022.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment