Hoctor -v- Schieb [2001] NSWADT 141

Hoctor -v- Schieb [2001] NSWADT 141

None of the matters raised by the applicant, whether individually or collectively, justified termination of the lease; the breaches were either trivial, remedied, or outside jurisdiction. The application was not proper under the statute or lease.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Claim for Surrender of Possession of Premises / Principal Matter
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['lease Termination' 'jurisdiction Under Retail Leases Act' 'obligations of Lessee' 'damages to Premises' 'council Approvals' 'costs']
['retail Leases' 'tenancy'] ['lease Termination' 'jurisdiction Under Retail Leases Act' 'obligations of Lessee' 'damages to Premises' 'council Approvals' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Claim for Surrender of Possession of Premises / Principal Matter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether lease may be terminated for alleged breaches' 'Whether areas covered by licences are within jurisdiction' 'Application of Retail Leases Act to mixed-use premises' 'Whether alleged breaches (e.g. damage, late rent, signage, kitchen relocation) justify lease termination']

Ratio Decidendi

None of the matters raised by the applicant, whether individually or collectively, justified termination of the lease; the breaches were either trivial, remedied, or outside jurisdiction. The application was not proper under the statute or lease.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['Application dismissed' "Applicant to pay Respondent's costs on a party/party basis as agreed or assessed from date of issue of failure of mediation certificate"]