Hughes, Commissioner for Income Tax (Qld) v Munro [1909] HCA 27
Section 32 of the Income Tax Act 1902 (Qld), as amended, applies to sales or dispositions of goods by absentees through Queensland agents only if, under the contract of sale (expressly or impliedly), the goods are to be brought into Queensland; the agent’s liability under the statute depends on this condition, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Joseph Hughes, Commissioner for Tax for Queensland; Respondent: Donald Munro
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of Queensland (full Court), on a Case Stated From the District Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; order of Supreme Court varied.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Liability of Agents for Absentees, Territorial Application of Tax Statutes, Interpretation of 'by Means Of' and 'is by the Contract to Be Brought Into Queensland' in Tax Legislation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Hughes, Commissioner for Tax for Queensland
Appellant
Donald Munro
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of Queensland (full Court), on a Case Stated From the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Meaning and scope of 'by means of' in sec. 32 of the Income Tax Act 1902 (Qld) as amended
- 2 Whether income tax could be levied in Queensland on income arising from sales of goods contracted abroad by an absentee, but sent into Queensland under contract
- 3 Jurisdiction of Queensland Legislature to impose such liability
Ratio Decidendi
Section 32 of the Income Tax Act 1902 (Qld), as amended, applies to sales or dispositions of goods by absentees through Queensland agents only if, under the contract of sale (expressly or impliedly), the goods are to be brought into Queensland; the agent’s liability under the statute depends on this condition, and 'by means of' includes agency falling short of authority to conclude the contract.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; order of Supreme Court varied.
Orders
- Declaration substituted that respondent is liable to be assessed in respect of income arising from sales or dispositions where contracts stipulate, expressly or impliedly, that goods are to be brought into Queensland.
- Direction as to costs in Supreme Court omitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment