Gilles v Penson [2014] NSWSC 1585

Gilles v Penson [2014] NSWSC 1585

The plaintiff firm had an arguable case for an equitable charge over the property, based on part performance of costs agreements despite their being unsigned. Leave to file a further caveat in substantially the same form as the earlier lapsed caveat was appropriate under s 74O as the facts were materially the same, and the lapse was accidental, with no demonstrated prejudice to Mrs Penson. Interlocutory orders restraining dealing with the property were justified pending final pleadings and hearing.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Hearing of Application to Extend/file Caveat and Directions to Final Hearing
Outcome
Leave granted to file further caveat; interlocutory injunction granted; directions for pleadings and listing for final hearing; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
['caveats' 'equitable Charge' 'real Property Act S 74 O' 'interlocutory Injunction']
['property Law' 'equity' 'civil Procedure'] ['caveats' 'equitable Charge' 'real Property Act S 74 O' 'interlocutory Injunction']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Hearing of Application to Extend/file Caveat and Directions to Final Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff firm has an arguable equitable interest by way of charge over the Alexandria property' 'Whether leave should be granted under Real Property Act s 74O to file a further caveat after lapse' 'Appropriateness of interlocutory relief pending final hearing']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff firm had an arguable case for an equitable charge over the property, based on part performance of costs agreements despite their being unsigned. Leave to file a further caveat in substantially the same form as the earlier lapsed caveat was appropriate under s 74O as the facts were materially the same, and the lapse was accidental, with no demonstrated prejudice to Mrs Penson. Interlocutory orders restraining dealing with the property were justified pending final pleadings and hearing.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to file further caveat; interlocutory injunction granted; directions for pleadings and listing for final hearing; costs reserved.

Orders

  • ['The plaintiffs be granted leave to file a further caveat on the Real Property known as unit 8, 4 Gillespie Avenue, Alexandria NSW 2015 substantially in the form of Exhibit 1.' 'The plaintiff is directed to file a Statement of Claim by 21 November 2014.' "Proceedings are adjourned to the Registrar's list at 9am on...