Regina v Joseph Phillipe [2004] NSWCCA 2
The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and reflected considerable leniency given the applicant's youth, pleas of guilty, good character, and prospects of rehabilitation. Proper sentencing practice required that the December sentences not be ordered wholly concurrently with the August sentences. Parity with co-offenders was appropriately considered and not determinative.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Joseph Phillipe
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, and Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Armed Robbery, Sentencing of Juvenile Offenders, Children (criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, Guideline Sentencing Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Joseph Phillipe
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, and Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 whether an extension of time should be granted to apply for leave to appeal
- 2 whether leave to appeal should be granted
- 3 whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and reflected considerable leniency given the applicant's youth, pleas of guilty, good character, and prospects of rehabilitation. Proper sentencing practice required that the December sentences not be ordered wholly concurrently with the August sentences. Parity with co-offenders was appropriately considered and not determinative.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Grant the applicant an extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal.
- Grant leave to appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment