Pollack v Yapp [2019] NSWCA 103
Given the parties’ agreement on a narrow issue and case management considerations, it is appropriate to stay the orders of the primary judge pending appeal and to adopt an expedited timetable for hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Pre Hearing Directions
- Outcome
- Orders made by the primary judge stayed; timetable set for appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['case Management' 'stay of Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Pre Hearing Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to grant a stay of the orders made by the primary judge pending appeal' 'Timetable for exchange of documents and listing of hearing']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the parties’ agreement on a narrow issue and case management considerations, it is appropriate to stay the orders of the primary judge pending appeal and to adopt an expedited timetable for hearing.
Court Disposition
Orders made by the primary judge stayed; timetable set for appeal.
Orders
- ['The appellant to file and serve the Appeal Book by 17 May 2019.' 'The appellant to file and serve submissions by 21 May 2019.' 'The respondents to file and serve submissions by 24 May 2019.' 'The appellant to file and serve submissions in reply by 28 May 2019.' 'The appellant to file and serve the Orange Book by...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment