Shamia v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 743

Shamia v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 743

The proposal, as amended, demonstrates reasonable compliance with the relevant planning controls and reduces adverse amenity impacts to an acceptable level; the revised roof height is consistent with adjoining properties and does not unreasonably encroach on view corridors. Consent orders are warranted, subject to conditions.

Parties
Applicant: Joseph Shamia; Respondent: Manly Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Legal Topics
Development Application, Demolition, Residential Flat Building, Amenity Impacts, Streetscape, Height Compliance, View Sharing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Shamia

Applicant

Manly Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the proposed development (demolition and construction of a three-storey residential flat building) should be approved in light of height, roof form, streetscape, impacts on views, and amenity impacts

Ratio Decidendi

The proposal, as amended, demonstrates reasonable compliance with the relevant planning controls and reduces adverse amenity impacts to an acceptable level; the revised roof height is consistent with adjoining properties and does not unreasonably encroach on view corridors. Consent orders are warranted, subject to conditions.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld.
  • Development consent granted for demolition and erection of a three-level residential flat building with basement parking, swimming pool, and landscaping at 90 Lauderdale Avenue, Fairlight, subject to conditions in Annexure A.