Vassallo v Deitz (Costs) [2024] NSWSC 424
There was nothing out of the ordinary about the proceedings or the defendants' conduct to warrant departure from the usual rule that costs follow the event; Mr Vassallo did not establish any proper basis for departure and must pay defendants' costs.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Joseph Sid Vassallo; First Defendant: Lindy Deitz; Second Defendant: Michael John Weston; Third Defendant: Local Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- Order that Mr Vassallo pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Costs Follow the Event, Departure From Usual Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Sid Vassallo
Plaintiff
Lindy Deitz
First Defendant
Michael John Weston
Second Defendant
Local Court of New South Wales
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the usual costs order should be made
- 2 Whether circumstances warrant a departure from the ordinary rule that costs follow the event
Ratio Decidendi
There was nothing out of the ordinary about the proceedings or the defendants' conduct to warrant departure from the usual rule that costs follow the event; Mr Vassallo did not establish any proper basis for departure and must pay defendants' costs.
Court Disposition
Order that Mr Vassallo pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- Mr Vassallo to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment