Smith v Mann [1932] HCA 30
Where a worker contracts a disease by a gradual process and the disease is incidental to the class of employment, the certificate of the Medical Board under sec. 51 certifying the condition (including causation where relevant) is conclusive, and it is not necessary to establish the disease was contributed to by the last employment. The Supreme Court was wrong in limiting causation to employment with the last employer or during only the preceding twelve months.
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Smith; Respondent: John Mann; Respondent: Mossop & Cooper; Respondent: W. R. J. Cox; Respondent: H. T. Seymour Ltd.; Respondent: A. A. Decros
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Workers' Compensation Appeal / High Court Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Disease, Diseases Contracted by Gradual Process, Medical Evidence, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Smith
Applicant
John Mann
Respondent
Mossop & Cooper
Respondent
W. R. J. Cox
Respondent
H. T. Seymour Ltd.
Respondent
A. A. Decros
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Workers' Compensation Appeal / High Court Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of a Medical Board under sec. 51 of the Workers' Compensation Act 1926 (N.S.W.) is conclusive as to the condition and cause of disablement for the purposes of entitlement to compensation.
- 2 Whether proof is required that a gradually contracted disease was actually brought about or contributed to by employment during the twelve months preceding incapacity.
Ratio Decidendi
Where a worker contracts a disease by a gradual process and the disease is incidental to the class of employment, the certificate of the Medical Board under sec. 51 certifying the condition (including causation where relevant) is conclusive, and it is not necessary to establish the disease was contributed to by the last employment. The Supreme Court was wrong in limiting causation to employment with the last employer or during only the preceding twelve months.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed with costs.
- Judgment of the Supreme Court discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment