Galego v Residential Tribunal & Anor [2000] NSWSC 472
A termination notice is not invalid merely because it was signed by a person who satisfied the requirements of a 'landlord's agent' under the Residential Tenancies Act 1987 but was not a licensed real estate agent; the legislation does not require such person to hold a licence under the 1941 Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Order of the Tribunal set aside; matter remitted for rehearing; costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['residential Tenancy' "landlord's Agent Requirements" 'validity of Termination Notice' 'licensing Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a termination notice signed by a person who is not a licensed real estate agent but who satisfies the definition of 'landlord's agent' under the Residential Tenancies Act 1987 is valid." 'Whether the Property, Stock And Business Agents Act 1941 applies to invalidate such a notice.']
Ratio Decidendi
A termination notice is not invalid merely because it was signed by a person who satisfied the requirements of a 'landlord's agent' under the Residential Tenancies Act 1987 but was not a licensed real estate agent; the legislation does not require such person to hold a licence under the 1941 Act.
Court Disposition
Order of the Tribunal set aside; matter remitted for rehearing; costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- ['The order made by the Tribunal is set aside.' 'The decision is remitted to the Tribunal for a rehearing.' "The second defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment