Joshua Douglas and Damien Douglas v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services & Ors [2017] NSWDC 361
The plaintiffs have a genuine concern for the child, but given the manner in which KD entered their care, the break in care, lack of familial connection, parenting capacity concerns, allegations against Joshua Douglas, his Working with Children bar, inability for oversight, and their history of dishonesty, they do not have sufficient prospects of success in being granted parental responsibility. Accordingly, the Court will not exercise its discretion to grant them leave to be joined as parties under s 98(3) of the Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'parental Responsibility' "children's Court Jurisdiction"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to be joined as parties to Children's Court proceedings concerning KD" 'Whether the plaintiffs have sufficient prospects of success in obtaining an order for parental responsibility for KD']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs have a genuine concern for the child, but given the manner in which KD entered their care, the break in care, lack of familial connection, parenting capacity concerns, allegations against Joshua Douglas, his Working with Children bar, inability for oversight, and their history of dishonesty, they do not have sufficient prospects of success in being granted parental responsibility. Accordingly, the Court will not exercise its discretion to grant them leave to be joined as parties under s 98(3) of the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The Appeal is dismissed.' "The decision of the Children's Court dated 29 September 2017 refusing the plaintiffs' application pursuant to s 98(3) of the Act is confirmed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment