R v Byass [2019] NSWDC 218
The application was refused because the judge could not be satisfied that, had the prosecution been in possession of all relevant facts prior to instituting proceedings, it would not have been reasonable to institute the proceedings. The case was properly committed to a jury and turned on an evaluation of witness credibility, which did not reach the threshold of substantial unreliability.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application for Costs Certificate After Acquittal / Post Verdict, Application for Costs
- Outcome
- application for costs certificate refused
- Legal Topics
- ['costs in Criminal Cases' 'application for Certificate Under Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (nsw)' 'prosecution Discretion' 'assessment of Witness Credibility' 'alibi Notice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Costs Certificate After Acquittal / Post Verdict, Application for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it would not have been reasonable to institute the proceedings if the prosecution had all relevant evidence at the time' 'Whether the applicant is entitled to a certificate under s 2 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was refused because the judge could not be satisfied that, had the prosecution been in possession of all relevant facts prior to instituting proceedings, it would not have been reasonable to institute the proceedings. The case was properly committed to a jury and turned on an evaluation of witness credibility, which did not reach the threshold of substantial unreliability.
Court Disposition
application for costs certificate refused
Orders
- ['Application for costs certificate under s 2 Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment